MUNICIPAL PRACTICES AND NEEDS REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY OF PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES IN QUÉBEC, CANADA

Stéphanie Gamache, Francois Routhier, Ernesto Morales, Marie-Hélène Vandersmissen, Jean Leblond, Normand Boucher, Bradford James McFadyen, Luc Noreau

Abstract


To create enabling environments for as many individuals as possible, including individuals with physical disabilities (IPD) who are more prone to encounter environmental barriers limiting their social participation, we need to examine current municipal practices related to accessibility. The objectives of this study were to describe existing practices for the design of accessible pedestrian infrastructures (API) for IPD living in Quebec (Canada), as well as to identify the perceived informational needs of the municipalities to design such infrastructures. A WEB survey was developed and validated by experts (i.e., municipal/provincial entities, IPD advocacy organisations, public transportation society, and researchers) and was sent to 507 municipalities. Descriptive statistics and recursive partitioning were performed, which allowed for the analyses of predictive variables using arborescence (e.g. the characteristics of the municipality that predict the implementation of various accessible design practices). A total of 186 respondents (representative of 184 of 507 municipalities) completed the survey (37%). Few municipalities have measures, resources and tools to ensure the design of API for IPD. However, many respondents perceived the need for such resources. The presence of an action plan for individuals with visual disabilities and their consultation, availability of human resources, and knowledge of tools for the design of API the implementation of other accessibility practices and should be targeted. Results of this study highlighted the need for conceptualization and implementation of guidelines to ensure API, and identified potential measures to improve practices that favor social participation of IPD.


Keywords


Pedestrian infrastructures, accessibility, physical disabilities, survey, municipal practices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, S., Kirby, R. L., & Macdonald, B. (2009). Wheelchair accessibility: descriptive survey of curb ramps in an urban area. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 4(1), 17-23.

Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4 Suppl), S99-123 e112.

Chaudhury, H., Campo, M., Michael, Y., & Mahmood, A. (2016). Neighbourhood environment and physical activity in older adults. Social Sience & Medicine(149), 104-113.

Clark, A. F., & Scott, D. M. (2016). Barriers to Walking: An Investigation of Adults in Hamilton (Ontario, Canada). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(179), 1-12.

Clifton, K. J., Livi Smith, A. D., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), 95-110.

Cooper, B. A., Cohen, U., & Hasselkus, B. R. (1991). Barrier-free design: a review and critique of the occupational therapy perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 344-350.

Cunningham, G. O., Michael, Y. L., Farquhar, S. A., & Lapidus, J. (2005). Developing a reliable Senior Walking Environmental Assessment Tool. American journal of preventive medicine, 29(3), 215-217.

de Leeuw, E. D., Jox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (2008). International handbook of survey methodology: European Association of Methodology.

de Sa, E., & Ardern, C. I. (2014). Neighbourhood walkability, leisure-time and transport-related physical activity in a mixed urban-rural area. PeerJ, 2, e440.

Deliot-Lefevre, P. (2006). L'accessibilité des cadres bâtis, des lieux publics et des transports. Gérontologie et Société, 4(119), 11-23.

Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys - The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edition ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Folcher, V. L., N. (2012). Accessibilité pour et dans l'usage : concevoir des situations d'activité adaptées à tous et à chacun. Le travail humain, 75, 89-120.

Fougeyrollas, P. (2010). Le funambule, le fil et la toile: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.

Fougeyrollas, P., Boucher, N., Fiset, D., Grenier, Y., Noreau, L., Philibert, M., et al. (2014). Handicap, environnement et droits humains : du concept d’accès à sa mesure. Revue Développement humain, handicap et changement social(November), 5-28.

Giesbrecht, E. M., Ripat, J. D., Cooper, J. E., & Quanbury, A. O. (2011). Experiences with using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair for community-based occupations: a qualitative exploration. Canadian Journal of Occupation Therapy, 78(2), 127-136.

Grant, T. L., Edwards, N., Sveistrup, H., Andrew, C., & Egan, M. (2010). Inequitable walking conditions among older people: examining the interrelationship of neighbourhood socio-economic status and urban form using a comparative case study. BMC Public Health, 10, 677.

Gray, D. B., Hollingsworth, H. H., Stark, S., & Morgan, K. A. (2008). A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30(6), 434-457.

Hajna, S., Ross, N. A., Joseph, L., Harper, S., & Dasgupta, K. (2015). Neighbourhood walkability, daily steps and utilitarian walking in Canadian adults. BMJ Open, 5(11), e008964.

Hoehner, C. M., Ivy, A., Ramirez, L. K., Handy, S., & Brownson, R. C. (2007). Active neighborhood checklist: a user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21(6), 534-537.

Institut Nazareth et Louis-Braille & Société Logique. (2012). Critères d'accessibilité répondant aux besoins des personnes ayant une déficience visuelle. Retrieved from http://www.inlb.qc.ca/documents/128/Criteres-d-accessibilite-universelle---Deficience-visuelle--amenagements-exterieurs?langue=fr&%3Bnavid=1&%3Bitem_id=1.

Ivey, M., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2006). Designing a physical environment for co-experience and assessing participant use. Paper presented at the Wonderground, Design Research Society International Conference 2006.

Kerr, J., & Rosenberg, D. E. (2009). Walking route audit tool for seniors [WRATS]. Retrieved 2010-12-15, from www.activelivingresearch.org/files/WRATS_AuditTool_07.17.09.pdf

Keysor, J. J., Jette, A. M., LaValley, M. P., Lewis, C. E., Torner, J. C., Nevitt, M. C., et al. (2010). Community environmental factors are associated with disability in older adults with functional limitations: the MOST study. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 65(4), 393-399.

Kirchner, C. E., Gerber, E. G., & Smith, B. C. (2008). Designed to deter. Community barriers to physical activity for people with visual or motor impairments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 349-352.

Law, M. (1991). 1991 Muriel Driver lecture. The environment: a focus for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal Of Occupation Therapy, 58(4), 171-180.

Lee, S. M., Tudor-Locke, C., & Burns, E. K. (2008). Application of a walking suitability assessment to the immediate built environment surrounding elementary schools. Health Promotion Practice., 9(3), 246-252.

McClain, L., Medrano, D., Marcum, M., & Schukar, J. (2000). A qualitative assessment of wheelchair users' experience with ADA compliance, physical barriers, and secondary health conditions. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 6(1), 99-118.

McCormack, G. R., Friedenreich, C., Sandalack, B. A., Giles-Corti, B., Doyle-Baker, P. K., & Shiell, A. (2012). The relationship between cluster-analysis derived walkability and local recreational and transportation walking among Canadian adults. Health & Place, 18(5), 1079-1087.

Millington, C., Ward Thompson, C., Rowe, D., Aspinall, P., Fitzsimons, C., Nelson, N., et al. (2009). Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). Health Place, 15(2), 474-481.

Mitra, R., Siva, H., & Kehler, M. (2015). Walk-friendly suburbs for older adults? Exploring the enablers and barriers to walking in a large suburban municipality in Canada. Journal of Ageing Studies, 35, 10-19.

Morales, E., Rousseau, J., & Passini, R. (2015). Using a Co-Design Methodology for Research on Environmental Gerontology. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research, 01(03).

Negron-Poblete, P., & Lord, S. (2014). Marchabilité des environnements urbains autour des résidences pour personnes âgées de la région de Montréal : application de l’audit MAPPA. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 58(164), 233-257.

Office des personnes handicapées [OPHQ]. (2009). « À part entière : pour un véritable exercice du droit à l’égalité », Politique gouvernementale pour accroître la participation sociale des personnes handicapées. Retrieved 2011/08/05, from http://www.ophq.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/documents/Politique_a_part_entiere_Acc.pdf

Rosner, B. (2006). Fundamentals of biostatistics (6th ed.). California: Duxbury.

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5-18.

Service de l’aménagement du territoire de la Ville de Québec. (2010). Guide pratique d’accessibilité universelle [Quebec City's Practical guide to universal accessibility]. from www.irdpq.qc.ca/communication/publications/guide_accessibilite/acces_Manuel_utilisation_2010.pdf

Shumway-Cook, A., Patla, A., Stewart, A. L., Ferrucci, L., Ciol, M. A., & Guralnik, J. M. (2005). Assessing environmentally determined mobility disability: self-report versus observed community mobility. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 700-704.

Spivock, M., Gauvin, L., & Brodeur, J. M. (2007). Neighborhood-level active living buoys for individuals with physical disabilities. American journal of preventive medicine, 32(3), 224-230.

Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods., 14(4), 323-348.

Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2007). Conducting online surveys: SAGE publications.

Thielman, J., Rosella, L., Copes, R., Lebenbaum, M., & Manson, H. (2015). Neighborhood walkability: Differential associations with self-reported transport walking and leisure-time physical activity in Canadian towns and cities of all sizes. Preventive Medicine, 77, 174-180.

Transports Québec. (2007). Normes de la construction routière MTQ – Normes [Construction norms of Quebec's ministry of Transport]. Retrieved 2011/10/05, from

www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/portal/page/portal/accueil/publications/normes

Tranter, R. T., Slater, R., & Vaughan, N. (1991). Barriers to mobility: physically-disabled and frail elderly people in their local outdoor environment. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research., 14(4), 303-312.

Union des municipalités du Québec, & Culture Communications et Condition féminine Québec. (2009). Ma ville en toute confiance: Guide des meilleures pratiques pour un aménagement sécuritaire destiné aux minicipalités et à leurs partenaires. from http://www.umq.qc.ca/uploads/files/pub_autres/Guide_AmenagementSecuritaire_mai09.pdf

Zhang, H., & Singer, B. (1999). Recursive partitioning in health sciences. New York: Springer.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v7i1.122

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Stéphanie Gamache, Francois Routhier, Ernesto Morales, Marie-Hélène Vandersmissen, Jean Leblond, Normand Boucher, Bradford James McFadyen, Luc Noreau

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. ISSN 2013-7087.
www.jacces.org

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.