Low vision users in graphical user interface interaction.

Examining the effects of visual perception parameters on quality of experience through a display style proposal.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v15i1.538

Abstract

Interaction design is the act of designing the dialogue between people and systems, services or products. User interface (UI) facilitates sensory and emotional interactions by acting as a bridge between users and products while graphical user interface (GUI) refers to graphical or visual presentations of information The accessibility of GUIs directly impacts the quality of experience (QoE) since the sense of sight plays a pivotal role especially for low vision users throughout the interaction process. Though low vision users can use GUIs on their own, they often face challenges that hinder their QoE. Although existing research has explored accessible UI design principles, studies specifically addressing the accessibility issues of low vision users in GUI interactions remain limited. The goal of this research is to evaluate the effects of visual perception differences between people with low and normal vision on home appliances’ GUI interactions and discuss how these differences affect the QoE of low vision users. To this end, we created a total of 12 washing machine GUI cases based on the GUI model of the best-selling washing machine in Turkey in 2021 and tested these cases online with two groups of 7 participants each with low vision and normal vision. The results infer that low vision participants have accessibility issues on GUIs in terms of colour contrasts, text sizes, display options and control panel distances. The study suggests that using an uppercase larger font (22pt) for just the first syllable of the text in text-based displays can improve accessibility of GUIs for low vision users compared to using the same font size (16pt) in sentence case for all text. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of the challenges faced by low vision users in GUI interactions and offers practical recommendations for creating more accessible GUIs through a display style proposal.

Author Biographies

  • M. Ferit Aydin, Gazi University

    Industrial Design Department, Dr.

  • H. Guclu Yavuzcan, Gazi University

    Industrial Department, Prof. Dr.

References

Alben, L. (1996). Quality of experience: Defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions, 3(3), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/235008.235010.

Bridger, R. S. (1995). Introduction to ergonomics. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1201%2Fb12640.

Corn, A. L. (1983). Visual function: A theoretical model for individuals with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 77(8), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X8307700801

Cushman, W. H., & Rosenberg, D. J. (1991). Human factors in product design: 14 (Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics). Elsevier. ISBN 0444890319, 9780444890313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90234-9.

Damon, A., Stoudt, H. W., & McFarland, R. A. (1966). The human body in equipment design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330250316.

Dini, S., Ferlino, L., Gettani, A., Martinoli, C., & Ott, M. (2007). Educational software and low vision students: Evaluating accessibility factors. Universal Access in the Information Society, 6(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0056-6.

Drummond, S. R., Drummond, R. S., & Dutton, G. N. (2004). Visual acuity and the ability of the visually impaired to read medication instructions. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 88(12), 1541-2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2003.029918.

Goodman, J., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2007). Formats for user data in inclusive design. In Stephanidis, C. (Eds) Universal access in human computer interaction. Coping with diversity: Vol 4554. (pp 117-126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_14.

Jacko, J. A., Dixon, M. A., Rosa Jr, R. H., Scott, I. U., & Pappas, C. J. (1999). Visual profiles: A critical component of universal access. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp 330-337). https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303105.

Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (1998). Designing interfaces for an overlooked user group: Considering the visual profiles of partially sighted users. In: Proceedings of the 3rd int. ACM Conf. on Assistive Technologies (pp 75-77). https://doi.org/10.1145/274497.274512.

Jin, B. S., & Ji. Y. G. (2010). Usability risk level evaluation for physical user interface of mobile phone. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.006.

Kline, D. W., & Schieber, F. (1985). Vision and aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (2nd ed., pp 296–331). Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-98143-012.

Kolko, J. (2010). Thoughts on interaction design. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann. https://archive.org/details/thoughtsonintera0000kolk.

Kraut, J. A., & McCabe, C. P. (1994). The problem of low vision: Definition and common problems. In D. M. Albert, F. A. Jakobiec, N. L. Robinson (Eds.) Principles and practice of ophthalmology 5 (pp 3664-6). Philadelphia: WB Saunders.

Lee, J. H. (2021). Accessible home appliance design methods for disabled and elderly users (Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Industrial Engineering. Seoul National University). https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/177380/1/000000167524.pdf

Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. M., Rhiu, I., & Yun, M. H. (2021). A persona-based approach for identifying accessibility issues in elderly and disabled users’ interaction with home appliances. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010368.

Lee, J. H., You, N., Lee, J., Lee, K. J., Yun, M. H., Han, J., Joeng, Y.-J, & Lee, H. (2019). Investigation of accessibility issues for visually impaired people when using washing machines. In Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (Eds), Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international ergonomics association (IEA 2018). Advances in intelligent systems and computing: Vol 824 (pp 1456-64). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_148.

Lee, K. I., Jin, B. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2011). The scenario‐based usability checklist development for home appliance design: A case study. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20212.

Mendez, J., & Mendoza, A. (2013). A conceptual framework to evaluate usability in mobile aged care applications: A health care initiative. In CONF-IRM 2013 Proceedings. 2. https://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2013/2.

Morshedzadeh, E., Ono, K., & Watanabe, M. (2016). A new model for improving user-product interaction evaluation, based on affordance and factor analysis. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 62(5), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.11247/jssdj.62.5_41.

Özden, A., Seheri, Ö., & Ersan, Ö. (2019). Beyaz eşya sektörü (White goods sector). Ekonomik Araştırmalar Departmanı, A&T Bank. Retrieved 15.02.2022, from https://www.atbank.com.tr/Documents/Features/ATB_beyaz-esya-sektoru_ek%C4%B1m-2019-pdf_217.PDF

Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2005). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375212.

Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (4. ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 1119020751, 9781119020752. https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Interaction+Design%3A+Beyond+Human-Computer+Interaction%2C+6th+Edition-p-9781119901112.

Pullin, G. (2009). Design meets disability. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262516747/design-meets-disability.

Sardegna, J., & Shelly, S. (2002). The encyclopedia of blindness and vision impairment. NY, USA: Infobase Publishing.

Segelström, F. (2009, November). Communicating through visualizations: Service designers on visualizing user research. In DeThinking Design, ReThinking Services – First Nordic Conf. on Service Design and Service Innovation (pp 175-185). Oslo: Linköping University Electronic Press. Retrieved 10.10.2024, from https://servdes.org/pdf/2009/segelstrom.pdf.

US Department of Justice. (2010) ADA standards for accessible design. American Disability Association. Washington, DC, USA. https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/design-standards/2010-stds/.

Vanderheiden , G. C., & Vanderheiden , K. R. (1992, January 7). Guidelines for the design of consumer products to increase their accessibility to people with disabilities or who are aging. Accessible Design of Consumer Products: University of Wisconsin System. Retrieved 10.10.2024, from https://park.org/Guests/Trace/pavilion/consumer.htm#disability.

WHO. (2004). International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems ICD-10: vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246208/1/9789241549165-V1-eng.pdf

WHO. (2011) World report on disability 2011. Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44575/?sequence=4.

Wood, J. M., & Troutbeck, R. J. (1994). Effect of age and visual impairment on driving and vision performance. Transp. Res. Rec., 1438, 84-90. Retrieved 20.02.2022, from https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1438/1438-011.pdf.

Image of the first page of the article. The name of the article, the authors, and the abstract are displayed.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

How to Cite

Low vision users in graphical user interface interaction.: Examining the effects of visual perception parameters on quality of experience through a display style proposal. (2025). Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v15i1.538