Understanding Risk in Daily Life of Diverse Persons with Physical and Sensory Impairments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v9i1.183Keywords:
people with impairments, risk perceptions, decision-making process, risk management and assessment.Abstract
Managing risk of injury in daily life is a task common to all humans. However, people with impairments face significantly greater challenges in both assessing and managing risk of injury. To find out more about how individuals with impairments understand risk, we developed a qualitative study design based on semi-structured interviews. Seven people with a broad range of impairments were recruited for the study. The interviews were analyzed and organized into a codification tree subdivided into four main sections: safety and risk management, risk situation portrayal, perceptions of safety measures and finally loss of control and strong sensations. The study revealed that the difficulties related to managing risk in day-to-day situations are much higher than for people without impairments and, indeed, are possibly under reported in the literature. The realization that risk is ever present in the daily lives of people with impairments has led us to reconsider how we move forward on the remainder of our study.References
Ashmead, D. H., Guth, D., Wall, R. S., Long, R. G., & Ponchillia, P. E. (2005). Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(11), 812-821.
Cheong, A. M., Geruschat, D. R., & Congdon, N. (2008). Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss. Optometry and vision science, 85(1), 26-36.
Chowdhury, M. F. (2015). Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: Debates and discussion. Quality & Quantity, 49(3), 1135-1143.
Cree, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1997). Responses to occupational hazards: Exit and participation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2(4), 304.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Edwards, G., Noreau, L., Boucher, N., Fougeyrollas, P., Grenier, Y., McFadyen, B. J., ... & Vincent, C. (2014). Disability, rehabilitation research and post-Cartesian embodied ontologies–has the research paradigm changed? In Environmental Contexts and Disability (pp. 73-102). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological bulletin, 51(4), 380.
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual review of psychology, 12(1), 473-498.
Fänge, A., Iwarsson, S., & Persson, Å. (2002). Accessibility to the public environment as perceived by teenagers with functional limitations in a south Swedish town centre. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(6), 318-326.
Flin, R., Mearns, K., Gordon, R., & Fleming, M. (1996). Risk perception by offshore workers on UK oil and gas platforms. Safety Science, 22(1-3), 131-145.
Fougeyrollas, P. (2010). La funambule, le fil et la toile: transformations réciproques du sens du handicap. Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., & St-Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation, 21(2), 127-141.
Genest, V. (2014). L’Infini : Réflexions Sur L’installation Immersive Interactive. Mémoire de maîtrise inédit. Québec: Université Laval.
Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo (Understanding social research) (p. 100). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Greening, L. (1997). Risk perception following exposure to a job-related electrocution accident: The mediating role of perceived control. Acta Psychologica, 95(3), 267-277.
Hassan, S. E. (2012). Are normally sighted, visually impaired, and blind pedestrians accurate and reliable at making street crossing decisions? Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 53(6), 2593-2600.
Kennedy, G. (2012). An Ontology of Trash: The Disposable and Its Problematic Nature. New York: State University of New York Press.
Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Tribble, D. S. C. (2007). Comparing the disability creation process and international classification of functioning, disability and health models. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(3), 233-242.
Landry, L. G. (2006). Preventing occupational injuries: Women's perception of risk from musculoskeletal exposures. AAOHN journal, 54(2), 75-83.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Short, J. F. (1984). The social fabric at risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American sociological review, 49(6), 711-725.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual review of psychology, 28(1), 1-39.
Sparf, J. (2016). Disability and Vulnerability: Interpretations of risk in everyday life. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(4), 244-252.
Taylor, B. J., & McKeown, C. (2013). Assessing and managing risk with people with physical disabilities: the development of a safety checklist. Health, Risk & Society, 15(2), 162-175.
Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American literature and culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Whiteneck, G., & Dijkers, M. P. (2009). Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 90(11), S22-S35.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or adapt the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Use of the work for commercial purposes are not allowed.
- Authors are able to publish the journal's published version of the work in other media (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as far as they inform the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All of that fact. When publishing their work in other sources, authors must mention the name of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, its ISSN, the number and issue in which the article was published and a link to the main page of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. Optionally, they can also include a link to the article published in the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
