How to interweave accessibility with didactic and technological quality of digital educational materials

Authors

  • Antonio Sarasa Universidad Complutense de Madrid Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-7954
  • Lourdes Moreno Computer Science Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés (Madrid), Spain. lmoreno@inf.uc3m.es https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-2546
  • Ana María Fernández-Pampillón Department of Linguistics, School of Philology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. Spain. apampi@filol.ucm.es https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-0159
  • Covadonga Rodrigo Department of Computer Languages and Systems, School of Computer Science, Uni-versidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain. covadon-ga@lsi.uned.es
  • Julián García-Villalobos Directorate for Education, Employment and Cultural Promotion. Spanish National Or-ganisation for the Blind (Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles, ONCE), Madrid, Spain. jgav@once.es
  • Yolanda González Freelance Web Accessibility. ygonzalezmar@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-4432
  • Ricardo García-Mata Computer Services and Research Support, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ma-drid, Spain. rgarcia@ucm.es

Abstract

Accessibility is a quality requirement for digital educational materials (or contents) in interactive learning environments. It ensures that students with disabilities do not face barriers when using such content. However, guaranteeing the accessibility of these materials is no easy task, at least for a significant part of the producers, evaluators, and users of educational materials, such as teachers. Proof of this can be found in the results of the case studies on the usability and reliability of technological accessibility evaluation standards conducted by Spanish Association for Standardisation (UNE) during the development of the Spanish Standard for the Quality of Digital Educational Materials UNE 71362. The results obtained show the difficulty of ensuring a good level of accessibility to digital educational materials, concluding that most creators and evaluators did not apply the guidelines due to either ignorance or difficulties. In order to minimise this problem, a new research approach has been taken based on unifying and abstracting the technology accessibility indicators from the regulations in force and integrating them, according to their applicability, transversally in the teaching and technological criteria of the new standard. This paper presents, explains and justifies this new approach in which the accessibility criteria are not isolated.

References

References

Angkananon, K., Wald, M., & Gilbert, L. (2013a). Findings of expert validation and review of the technology enhanced interaction framework. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice, Las Vegas, US.

Angkananon, K., Wald, M., & Gilbert, L. (2013b). Using the Technology Enhanced Interaction Framework for Interaction Scenarios involving Disabled People. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Information Technology., Bangkok.

Angkananon, K., Wald, M., & Gilbert, L. (2013). Using the technology enhanced interaction framework for interaction scenarios involving disabled people. International Journal of Advances in Computer Science and its Applications-IJCSIA, 3, 1-5.

Angkananon, K., Wald, M., & Gilbert, L. (2014). User Evaluation of Technology Enhanced Interaction Framework. the 14th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 2(LNCS 8548), 342-349.

BSI. (2010). Accessibility - Code of Practice BS8878 Retrieved 22/04, 2015, from https://www.access8878.co.uk/

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: Sage.

Gaines, B. R. (1988). A conceptual framework for person-computer interaction in complex systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(4), 532-541. doi: 10.1109/21.17371

National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, & The National Telecommunications Commission. (2009). The provision of telecommunications services for the disabled and the elderly in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand.

Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design Retrieved 20/04, 2015, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/

Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre. (2005). Local Museum Database Retrieved 07/02/, 2012, from http://www.sac.or.th/databases/museumdatabase_eng/

Proctor, N. (2005). Off Base or On Target? Pros and Cons of Wireless and Location-Aware Applications in the Museum Paper presented at the ICHIM 05 - Digital Culture & Heritage, Paris, France. http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/ichim05/Proctor.pdf

Shneiderman, B. (2010). The Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design Retrieved 20/04, 2015, from https://www.cs.umd.edu/users/ben/goldenrules.html

ThailandTourist. (2014). Suchart Subsin, the Puppet Master and his Museum Retrieved 18/08/2014, 2014, from http://www.thailandtourist.net/guide/9_0_124_1_Puppet-Master-and-Museum.html

W3C. (2008a). Mobile Accessibility Retrieved 20/04, 2015, from http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/

W3C. (2008b). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Retrieved 22/04, 2015, from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

Yao, B. (2011). Mental simulations in comprehension of direct versus indirect speech quotations. [PhD thesis].

Article cover

Published

2019-11-17

How to Cite

Sarasa, A., Moreno, L., Fernández-Pampillón, A. M., Rodrigo, C., García-Villalobos, J., González, Y., & García-Mata, R. (2019). How to interweave accessibility with didactic and technological quality of digital educational materials. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 9(2), 141-168. Retrieved from http://jacces.org/index.php/jacces/article/view/193